https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337
--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkab...@redhat.com> ---
Thanks for your comments, guys:
- As for the %{python} macro, where in the specfile do I use it in an
inappropriate place?
- The "macro madness" is there because when the package goes through the
review, I want it to have minimal diff with "python-docs" package (which this
package is based on, BTW). So each spec will hardcode the python version, but
each will be different.
- %build - yes, I just create documentation and remove the .buildinfo dir,
nothing else needed
- If I'm referring to the same docs as you, they are already generated and
can't be regeneraged. I consider that bad, everything should be built from
source, IMO, even just documentation.
- As for the Koji failure, that's interesting... I didn't experience it in my
local mock, but I admit I didn't scrub it before building. I'll investigate and
repost the spec and srpm once I find the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NMCE2lcdAG&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
