Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592733

--- Comment #5 from Edwind Richzendy Contreras Soto <[email protected]> 
2010-05-22 19:52:06 EDT ---
hi all, here I have an improved version of spec file:

http://richzendy.org/repo/turpial/turpial.spec

For those wishing to test the rpm, here's to download:

http://richzendy.org/repo/turpial/turpial-1.3.2-a1.1.fc12.noarch.rpm

For those who want the source rpm, here's to download:

http://richzendy.org/repo/turpial/turpial-1.3.2-a1.1.fc12.src.rpm

here I have rpmlint output:

rpmlint -i turpial-1.3.2-a1.1.fc12.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint -i turpial-1.3.2-a1.1.fc12.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Any recommendation is welcome.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to