Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592668 --- Comment #3 from David Cornette <[email protected]> 2010-05-24 01:17:38 EDT --- Thanks for taking a look at this package. I probably should have put links to the discussion of this package on fedora-legal-list. My original post: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-May/001272.html The response I received: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-May/001273.html The recommendation of the list was that it could be packaged, with the recommendation that the Pure Data license file be included, and the License: be set to GPLv2+ and BSD. However, as you point out, the pdf file is under a different license. The markings in the lower left corner indicate that it is under a Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives license, which is considered a good license for content. I have made a new package with the license tag changed to reflect the license for that documentation. Spec URL: http://www.davidcornette.com/ladspa-autotalent-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.davidcornette.com/ladspa-autotalent-plugins-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm As for the patents, I believe they are not a concern. It is referring to U.S. Patents 4646256 and 4878187. According to http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4646256.html , the first was filed on 03/19/1984 and published on 02/24/1987. This expired in 2004. The second is found at http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4878187.html and was filed on 06/22/1988 and published 10/31/1989, so it expired in 2008. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
