https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018057



--- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> ---
%changelog
* Sat Oct 12 2013 Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> 0-0.2.hg61664b8425f3
- compiler plugin in archful base package
- libraries in noarch (except rhel6) devel subpackage


Spec URL:
http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.spec

SRPM URL:
http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.2.hg61664b8425f3.fc21.src.rpm

$ rpmlint
RPMS/x86_64/golang-googlecode-goprotobuf-0-0.2.hg61664b8425f3.fc21.x86_64.rpm
golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/bin/protoc-gen-go
golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary
/usr/bin/protoc-gen-go
golang-googlecode-goprotobuf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary protoc-gen-go
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

Note: 1. Should the docs go with base package or devel subpackage? (currently
going with base)

2. with base package:-  Requires: protobuf (not entirely sure)

3. Installing only the binary and not the .a archives (for now)

4. Current location of protoc-gen-go binary is /usr/bin, but README suggests
$GOPATH/bin

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to