https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021017
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James <[email protected]> --- Given that upstream's version number is 2013-09-06, which we can't use, I fail to see how any of the 3 transformations is any better than the others. The version number has to be altered somehow. Why does it matter how? $ rpmdev-vercmp lexertl-2013_09_06-1.fc21 lexertl-2013_09_07-1.fc21 lexertl-2013_09_06-1.fc21 < lexertl-2013_09_07-1.fc21 $ rpmdev-vercmp lexertl-2013.09.06-1.fc21 lexertl-2013.09.07-1.fc21 lexertl-2013.09.06-1.fc21 < lexertl-2013.09.07-1.fc21 $ rpmdev-vercmp lexertl-20130906-1.fc21 lexertl-20130907-1.fc21 lexertl-20130906-1.fc21 < lexertl-20130907-1.fc21 It appears to me that rpm handles them all equally well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
