https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
--- Comment #32 from Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> --- Thank you for putting in the effort to address the linking issues and working with upstreams - it is really appreciated. The libdl dep should be handled like other library dep - a true/false macro should be added to the AC_CHECK_LIB() call (see the call for crypto a little below) to set a DL_LIBS variable which would only be added to those link lines that need it. Although I'm not seeing any more unused lib dep rpmlint messages myself on F20, so I'm not sure it is necessary. FWIW - If you still want to target EPEL5, you'll need BuildRoot and %clean. If not, I would drop the conditionals for %{rhel}<=5. Finally - are you *sure* you want to keep the -devel packages as noarch? Michael has pointed out some of the drawbacks to that, and the gains are very little. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
