https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027770
--- Comment #28 from Alec Leamas <[email protected]> --- Hm... As for ocserv, I think upstream has confirmed that the proper license for those files should be GPLv2+. This makes it possible to patch the files, with the reference above in a comment. The easiest is perhaps to add some sed patching in %prep. Don't forget the reference, patching licenses is no walk in the park ;) That's one license less. While we're on it: Although the GL makes it necessary to list all the licenses, you can still promote things as long as the license allows. E. g., you can promote LGPLv2.1 to GPLv2+ according to specific LGPL rules. The simple way is to list the files as LGPLv2.1 in the break-down, but add a note that you promote those to GPLv2+ in the same break-down. This makes it possible to exclude LGPLv2.1 from the License: tag. One less... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
