Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983

--- Comment #25 from ELMORABITY Mohamed <[email protected]> 2010-05-31 
11:27:20 EDT ---
Better indeed :-)
Technically only one things is blocking its approval:

* The latest version of rpmlint has some surprises:
$ rpmlint -i python-visual-5.32-5.fc13.x86_64.rpm 
python-visual.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so.3.0.0
cvisualmodule.so.3()(64bit)
A shared object soname provides is provided by a file in a path from which
other packages should not directly load shared objects from.  Such shared
objects should thus not be depended on and they should not result in provides
in the containing package.  Get rid of the provides if appropriate, for
example by filtering it out during build.  Note that in some cases this may
require disabling rpmbuild's internal dependency generator.

python-visual.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cvisualmodule.so.3.0.0
cvisualmodule.so.3(CVISUAL_0_0)(64bit)
A shared object soname provides is provided by a file in a path from which
other packages should not directly load shared objects from.  Such shared
objects should thus not be depended on and they should not result in provides
in the containing package.  Get rid of the provides if appropriate, for
example by filtering it out during build.  Note that in some cases this may
require disabling rpmbuild's internal dependency generator.


By the way, the build is quite silent, I had to check a generated log file to
check flags and such. I don(t know if it can be considered to be an issue, but
its quite annoying for debugging.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to