https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028164
--- Comment #3 from Adrien Devresse <[email protected]> --- > These build dependencies are direct build dependencies. Using indirect > dependencies of other build dependencies to fulfil direct build dependences > is in most cases not a good idea, since indirect dependencies can change when > the version of the dependencies change. While it is true that the current > version of globus-xio-gsi-driver-devel has a dependency on globus-xio-devel > >= 3 this does not imply that all previous versions of > globus-xio-gsi-driver-devel had such a requirement, or that all future > versions will have it. Question of point of view :) For devel packages, removing a dependency to an other -devel package means often an API/ABI break which should not occurs anyway. However, I know that the globus dependency tree is not trivial I wanted to signal it, but it's clearly not a blocking issue for me. > Yes. Without it configure fails: > > checking documentation dependencies... failed > configure: error: Documentation dependencies could not be satisfied. Fine for me. > You tried to build a SRPM generated on Fedora 19 on EPEL 5. This fails since > newer versions of rpm uses more modern digest algorithms that are not > supported by the older rpm version on EPEL 5. If this should work you need to > force the use of MD5 instead of the default. My apologizes for this, I did not think to this usual md5 problem. EL5 compiles now without problems : EL5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6283592 Nothing critical anymore for me, package well done & accepted. Adrien -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
