https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040459



--- Comment #4 from Dan Fruehauf <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Simon Farnsworth from comment #3)
> Down to a couple of nitpick level comments, which are as likely to be proof
> of my ignorance as anything else:
> 
>  * Patch0's comment - could it include a link to your upstream submission as
> described in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment ?
I've sent an email to the maintainer, unfortunately there's no upstream
bugzilla for that...
> 
>  * You still Require: gtk3, when autorequires will pull it in; is there a
> reason to do this? Similarly, do you need the UI for gnome-keyring and CLI
> tools for dbus, or just the libraries that autorequires pull in? My
> understanding of
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires is
> that you shouldn't put Require: lines in if autorequires pulls in enough.
Yep, you're right, it's just unnecessary clutter. Removed.
> 
> If I've misunderstood something, please correct me - I'm new at this.
> 
> Oh, and if you've got any spare time, a review of bug 1034341 would be
> appreciated.
I'm going to review it now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to