https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044607

Antonio Trande <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(anto.trande@gmail |
                   |.com)                       |



--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #5)
> Any progress?

I'm waiting for License file. 

> Adding license texts separate from upstream is explicitly forbidden.

Honestly, I read the contrary on the wiki:

> However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling 
> to > provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the 
> indicated > license requires that the full license text be included, Fedora 
> Packagers must > either:
> ...
> - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be, as 
> part of the Fedora package in %doc, in order to remain in compliance. It is 
> worth noting that this may place some additional risk on the packager, 
> however, 
> ...
> - Choose not to package that software for Fedora. 

Am I in wrong ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to