https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058805
Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Rob Crittenden from comment #1) > Is the 2.2 vs 2.4 logic needed? I don't think 2.2 has shipped in Fedora > since Fedora 17. It looks like some other Apache modules do this, do you > know how long this will be required? The goal is to get the module into/built for RHEL 6 which has Apache 2.2, and for consistency reasons I prefer to maintain just one .spec file in the upsream. So the answer is "as along as we want to build for RHEL 6/EPEL 6" as well. > You use a glob if the module configuration directory differs from the Apache > configuration directory but a specific file otherwise. Is there a reason for > this? > > Similarly you use a glob for the shared library but there is only one file, > so why not be specific? No specific reason really. I probably used a pattern from other module. I can can fix it or leave it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
