Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523034

--- Comment #7 from Ruben Kerkhof <[email protected]> 2010-06-06 07:19:47 
EDT ---
In reply to comment #5:

> - upstream released a new version

Ok, here's version 0.5.9:
SPEC:
http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-setuptools_trial.spec
SRPM:
http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-setuptools_trial-0.5.9-1.fc14.src.rpm

> could you please be a bit more specific in %files, so you know, if the
> egg is build?

Sure, done

> I didn't found a not on upstreams webpage, if python3 is supported
> and what their plans are (releasing two different tarballs, or is
> 2to3 supposed to run?
> Could you ask them please?

I haven't heard anything about python3 from upstream (yet). They're busy
releasing a new version right now, so I suspect it can take a while. It surely
doesn't have a hight priority.

In reply to comment #6

> Is there any reason to del requires.txt in egg-info?

Not that I can remember, it's been a while since I started with this package.
Removed, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to