https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw <[email protected]> --- Small update... His xmlrpccpp is no longer the same as xmlrpc++, it is effectively a fork. I did a diff of the two and there are significant differences. This raises the question, how much code must be the same among several projects (flrig, fldigi, flamp) from the same upstream before it is considered "bundled". We went back and forth quite a bit and he agreed to look at allowing the use of a shared library version of xmlrpccpp with the default to remain using the bundled code, HOWEVER, his main rational for not releasing a separate library is that he doesn't want to become the upstream for support of the library for other projects which keeping the code in his source tree does discourage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
