Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601633 Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2010-06-09 10:25:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Would you update rubygem-net-ssh review request? > I was talking to the guy who did the review request for rubygem-net-ssh. > Could I add a new specfile/srpm on behalf of the requestor? Or do I have to > wait until he doesn't respond? I think you can submit your new srpm now (because from the response on the other bug it seems the original submitter is busy at the moment). If the original submitter wants to co-maintain net-ssh, we can add him to package owners' list later. > > Also where is rubygem(xapian-full)? > I will package it as soon as rubygems.org comes back up. I was hoping I could > use xapian-bindings-ruby inplace of rubygem(xapian-full), but as it turns out > I > can't. Would you check if xapian-bindings-ruby isn't really sufficient? (please check my comments on ruby-sig) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
