https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589
--- Comment #9 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8) > (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #7) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6) > > > - /usr/include/coin has still not any owner. > > > See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7 > > > > It has an owner, the problem should be that the -devel > > requires does not explicitly require the owner of the > > directory, what should be fixed now. > > > > $ rpm -qf /usr/include/coin > > coin-or-CoinUtils-devel-2.9.7-3.fc21.x86_64 > > coin-or-CoinUtils-devel owns that directory only in the package f21; I > checked in Fedora 20 (2.9.0-3) instead. :P I can make an update. Just that I am still half way in adding coin-or-* projects/packages to Fedora, so I did not bother earlier to update f20, sorry :-( > > > - I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package. > > > > I am following an earlier advice from Jerry James, because > > doxygen documentation is (frequently) quite large, and is better > > not being owned by the main or devel packages on those cases. > > I agree; I mean -doc may even not require '%{name} = %{version}-%{release}'. That is something to think about :-) but usually if someone wants documentation, also wants devel and runtime. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
