https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077295

Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> ---
Review:

+ Package built successfully in mock rawhide

+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
perl-Exporter-Tiny.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro %description -l C %EXPORT_TAGS
perl-Exporter-Tiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coderefs ->
code refs, code-refs, recorders
perl-Exporter-Tiny.src: W: unexpanded-macro %description -l C %EXPORT_TAGS
perl-Exporter-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coderefs ->
code refs, code-refs, recorders
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball:e2e8d08ce4a959d3be3efdfac4cd6d57ff3ea38801b18b3a99c4b3df9306a3f7
upstream
tarball:e2e8d08ce4a959d3be3efdfac4cd6d57ff3ea38801b18b3a99c4b3df9306a3f7

+ License is valid and included in

+ %check showed
All tests successful.

+ Package perl-Exporter-Tiny-0.036-2.fc21.noarch
Provides: perl(Exporter::Shiny) = 0.036 perl(Exporter::Tiny) = 0.036
perl-Exporter-Tiny = 0.036-2.fc21
Requires: perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(Exporter::Tiny) perl(strict) perl(warnings)

+ rest looks as per packaging guidelines

Suggestions:
1) Please correct the buildroot tag to one of the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#BuildRoot_tag


APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to