https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082332
--- Comment #3 from Jamie Nguyen <jamieli...@fedoraproject.org> ---
(In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #2)
> Looking at the names in %{_bindir} I'd guess this will conflict with the
> original tiny-lr. But that upstream seems really dead, so I'm happy to ship
> this.
>
> I'd suggest contacting upstream and let them know they can steal the real
> tiny-lr name if that upstream is really dead, following the advice in 'npm
> help disputes':
> https://www.npmjs.org/doc/misc/npm-disputes.html
There is a comment here from tiny-lr-fork maintainer:
https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-contrib-watch/pull/296#issuecomment-36043332
> I appreciate the intent but I don't consider tiny-lr
> "abandoned" unless @mklabs has stated he has abandoned
> it. I believe he is just on hiatus and hopefully will
> return (as he is a great developer I really appreciate
> his work).
> The note about the tests kinda freaks me out a little, are we too old or
> they?
They are too old. Our express and connect is right up to date! (Well, ok so in
the time that it took me to post the updates and get them pushed to stable,
there's been a new minor point release of both...)
> Nothing blocking here though, so APPROVED.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
