https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069335
--- Comment #24 from Steven Dake <[email protected]> --- Angus, Strictly speaking this package meets the license guidelines by installing any package installs common which installs license and readme. I don't like to leave things open to interpretation re licensing however in package reviews, so I think it would make sense to add the license (and possibly the readme) to each of the subpackages as %doc sections. The rpmlint errors look fine, fedora-review gives a clean bill of health, and a manual review of the package since its complex shows it looks to be in good order. I'll be happy to approve once the %doc is added to each subpackage. Regards -steve -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
