https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941
--- Comment #11 from Han Frederic <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Han Frederic from comment #7) > Dear antonio, > . I have managed to adapt the 1.1.1 make check running from the spec. > > But before submitting a new spec I have some questions. > > . I found GPLv3 and GPLv2 files in the original 1.1.0 source archive, so I > can put them where we want to. But GPLv2 was baddly located in the original > 1.1.0 source so I asked upstream for some clean up about License (code vs > non fr doc). > As a consequence all the GPLv2+ files in the doc were raised in 1.1.1 to > GPLv3+. So do you think we can release the non fr DOC under GPLV3+ with the > 1.1.0 package? > > (In term of binaries, 1.1.1 is recent and evolving while 1.1.0 is fixed, > that's why I worked on the 1.1.0 packaging.) > > best > > F.H Add some comments (and links): B.Parisse's answer (in french) to my post that he had raised all the GPLv2+ doc to GPLv3+ to have a homogeneous situation: http://xcas.e.ujf-grenoble.fr/XCAS/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1458 this modification was effective since the 9 Apr 2014 in the README of: http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/giac-1.1.1.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
