Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602574

Martin Gieseking <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking <[email protected]> 2010-06-14 
10:37:51 EDT ---
Hi Jeremy,

here are some initial comments:

- according to file README, the license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3 only

- to simplify things, I suggest to replace the rm and rmdir line with 
  rm -rf %{buildroot}/usr/share/doc/

- remove "%doc" from "%doc %{_mandir}/man1/patchelf.1*"

- don't mix tabs and spaces for indentation

- The tarball contains a couple of tests. It's probably a good idea to run them
(with "make check" in a %check section).


$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-i386/result/*.rpm
patchelf.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US executables ->
executable, executable s, executrices
patchelf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US executables ->
executable, executable s, executrices
patchelf.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
patchelf.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10)
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

The missing buildroot tag can be ignored if you plan to maintain this package
for Fedora only. Otherwise, you should add one and also clean the buildroot in
%install.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to