https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
--- Comment #46 from Richard Shaw <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #45) > Concerning the base package requirements: I'm not sure how to interpret [1] > > "When a subpackage requires the base package, it must do so using a fully > versioned arch-specific (for non-noarch packages) dependency > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" > > The result of having the requires autogenerated is basically the same, > except that they are not fully versioned. While it may be technically questionable, it seems overboard to replicate something that RPM is already handling for you. To correct it I would have to manually check the requires of the subpackages for ones that are not provided within the package and then find what package provides them. Then I would have to keep this updated for new releases. The lack of versioned requires doesn't bother me since it's all coming from the same source archive and upstream does a good job of bumping the soversion when ABI incompatible changes are made. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
