https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070702
--- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Honza Horak from comment #13) > This can be solved by introducing lmdb-libs subpackage, that would include > only the library (and necessary doc -- license, ...) Maybe lmdb for binaries and liblmdb for libraries? That is like acl package is doing. That might also make above liblmdb folks happy? Just a suggestion. Personally I am also fine with lmdb-libs or similar :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
