https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166
Eduardo Echeverria <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria <[email protected]> --- Hi Martin. As said @Jason, some tags are specifically EPEL5's dependents, please don't use it. refer to epel packaging guidelines for further details (It is important to note that epel6 guidelines are the same of fedora) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging. This is a snapshot or stable release? if is a snapshot, check this guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages If you not have anything to build in %build section, put it a comment as "Nothing to build" there I think that screenfetch-dev it is not a good name for an "binary", I recommend rename it. From my POW, bash not should be a explicit requirement, due to is the default in fedora and other linux distributions. For now, I will take this, I'm waiting your fixes soon. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
