https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101016
Mikolaj Izdebski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Izdebski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Gerard Ryan from comment #8) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5) > > should be obsolete tesla-concurrent-localrepo ... ? > > I'm not 100% sure that it needs to in this case, does it? I'm not so > familiar with package renaming. I can't think of any situation where these > would clash, and I'll be retiring/blocking tesla-concurrent-localrepo once > this is available in the repos. Actually obseleting > tesla-concurrent-localrepo could cause issues, since this doesn't provide > the same artifact, or classes on the same namespace. Does that make sense, > or should I still obselete? At least obsoletes should be included. Otherwise people updating from older rawhide will be left with the old package. (Blocking the package in Koji doesn't cause it to be removed from installed systems during update, but obsoletion does.) Provides are not required if you migrate all dependant packages to use the new name (in this case I guess it's just M2E using this package). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
