https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107441
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- > With the current non-arched requirement the i686-mainpkg will satisfy the > dependency of the x86_64-develpkg, which will result in a dangling symlink > and possibly other strange problems in chain of that. ;) That never happens *if* there is a proper SONAME, because then the -devel subpkg automatically requires that one [-> Requires: libudt.so.0()(64bit)]. The case you refer to can happen with other packages (e.g. non-lib packages) or no-SONAME libs - you know this one already: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7438/lpsolve-5.5.2.0-8.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
