https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111691
--- Comment #21 from David Nichols <da...@qore.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #20)
> > libqore.x86_64: E: useless-provides qore-module(abi)
>
> rpmlint is mistaken in this case. A bug report had been filed years ago in
> bug 460872, but it has been closed due to a misunderstanding.
ok thanks for that info.
> > Provides: qore-module(abi)%{?_isa} = 0.19
>
> At some time, adding %{?_isa} to create arch-specific dependencies has
> become popular and can also help the depsolver. For example, when the
> depsolver encounters broken deps in a multiarch repo such as x86_64, it
> would try to resolve the deps with i686 packages (even older ones), which
> sometimes leads to pulling in lots of i686 packages.
>
> If you choose to add %{?_isa}, there is not much reason to also add the
> non-%isa Provides.
>
> The audacious packages had started with non-%isa Provides, which should be
> dropped nowadays since nothing depends on them anymore.
ok I see that makes sense - I also had the same thought, but thought it was
safer to do it just like an already-accepted package.
new URLs:
Spec URL: http://qore.org/srpms/qore.spec
SRPM URL: http://qore.org/srpms/qore-0.8.11.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
only the qore-module(abi) Provides were updated to remove the non-%isa
versions.
Michael, thanks a lot for your time, expertise, and help with this package
submission review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
