https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
Dave Love <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Dave Love <[email protected]> --- I've just been doing it; never mind. Would you accept a patch for EPEL6? (cp2k 2.5 builds on EPEL6 with devtoolset-2, and I was going to put it in copr when I'd rebuilt against elpa.) I had to avoid patching configure since it needs more recent autotools than in EPEL6, and I'd have to check that recipe for the Fedora releases. I can't find any packaging rules about library names, but wouldn't it be better to call it libelpa? If nothing else it helps things like rpmorphan. It would probably be useful to package versions with other optimizations, like sandybridge in our case, but I wasn't sure how best to do it and couldn't find any examples. I wonder if there should be a policy on that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
