Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606288 ELMORABITY Mohamed <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from ELMORABITY Mohamed <[email protected]> 2010-06-21 11:13:09 EDT --- Hi, I will review your package. At first sight, the .spec looks quite good. Anyway there are some compilation issues in 32-bit architecture only: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2261932 As you can see in the logs, the configure script fails to detect basic glibc functions and headers (string.h, limits.h, etc), so the compilation cannot be run correctly. It comes from the fact that the 64-bit flag -m64 is always enabled, whatever the architecture, when dependencies are detected in configure; as given in configure.ac: extended_CFLAGS="-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"; [...] CFLAGS="${default_CFLAGS} ${extended_CFLAGS}"; A (quick) solution could be to remove -m64 from extended_CFLAGS in configure, like this in your .spec: %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p1 sed -i '/^extended_CFLAGS=/ s/-m64//' configure Since RPM_OPT_FLAGS obviously already contains -m64, this change doesn't affect 64-bit builds. But you must report this issue to the bfast developers. By the way, submit also your patch about pthread, the missing pthread flags are a serious problem when building the program on Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
