https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
--- Comment #1 from Alexey I. Froloff <[email protected]> --- [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown license. freecode says "BSD Revised", spec file says MIT, LICENSE file contains license texts, that looks to me BSD-like. freecode page is being maintained by upstream, so I'd say it's "BSD". And not really a bug, just complains from fedora-review: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM %description -Osh is an enhanced, backward-compatible port of the Sixth Edition Thompson -shell. Sh6 is an unenhanced port of the shell, and glob6 is a port of +Osh(1) is an enhanced, backward-compatible port of the Sixth Edition Thompson +shell. Sh6(1) is an unenhanced port of the shell, and glob6(1) is a port of its global command. Together, sh6 and glob6 provide a user interface which is -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
