Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #65 from Alex Lancaster <[email protected]> 2010-06-22 13:16:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) > (In reply to comment #62) > > Just for curiosity, do you know why the JAR installed (6 MB) is 150% bigger > > than the one generated by the authors (4 MB)? > Because this package is not valid, accorded to the guidelines. It embeds > dependencies, whereas it is forbidden: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software That shouldn't be the case according to the review in comment #49, it claims: "+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries." It appears that the reviewer may have missed that jars were still being bundled, even though it seems that from comment #2 some bundled jars were identified and (apparently) removed around comment #4, but some may have been added since. > 4) add ant and metadata-extractor as Requires. Actually the installation pulls in the metadata-extractor as a separate package so the "Requires" appear OK, it's just that the .class files for that package are duplicated inside josm.jar, so apparently the packager didn't remove them properly from the created josm.jar This needs to be fixed before this bug is closed as it appears the package passed review prematurely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
