https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091657
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from comment #1) > Few general comments/questions: > - Does introducing python34 mean that we will be creating python34-foo > packages for EPEL? I think that has to be the case. > - Does introducing python34 mean that your intention in future is to also > maintain python35, python36, ...? Not particularly. If sometime down the road, python34 has crusted over too much there might be a push to move to a new python3X. > > I'm not opposed to this, but we will probably need to standardize how > extension packages should be packaged for python3X in EPEL. E.g. assuming we > have python34 and python35, does that mean that we'll also need > python3{4,5}-setuptools and the same for any other package? After several > years, we could end up with several huge stacks of unmaintained packages and > I have to admit I really don't like the idea. What are your thoughts on this? Yeah, this could be a big risk. It's probably a good idea to reach out to more EL7 stakeholders and trying to build a consensus plan for pytho3 in EL7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
