Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607079 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <[email protected]> 2010-06-23 12:12:47 EDT --- 1, 2, and 3 are fixed. But 4 really looks like "GPL+ or Artistic" - even though it includes the text of GPLv2, the very top of LICENSE file states quite clearly Terms of Perl itself a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or b) the "Artistic License" and Cycle.pm states that is indeed under the same terms as Perl itself. New SPEC: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle.spec New SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Template-Plugin-Cycle-1.06-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
