https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120297
Petr Pisar <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar <[email protected]> --- URL and Source0 are usable. Ok. Source archive is original (SHA-256: cb7af9300a851afaf3c8e1d871248d53eb02106b0d9d838350e43ce14b4e7b09). Ok. FATAL: The license statements contradict. LICENSE states (Artistic or GPL+), Filters.pod stated "as Perl" but links to (Artistic) only, and README states "All Rights Reserved.". While I believe upstream wants (Artistic or GPL+), this is highly confusing and you have to clarify it with upstream anr/or Fedora legal departement. Hint: Upstream has released 0.15 version where the changelog promises improvements in the legal texts. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
