https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126459
Kalev Lember <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <[email protected]> --- Hi Michael, Thanks for packaging this up and sorry for the delay; I'm now back from GUADEC / Flock so lets try and get this in. The spec file looks nice and clean, but I have a question about naming. Usually packages in Fedora follow the convention where upstream tarball name == srpm name. This often makes packaging simpler and easier to understand. Have you considered calling the spec/srpm "qqwing" and name the binary packages "qqwing", "qqwing-devel" and "qqwing-libs"? It's definitely not a blocker and it's fine the way it is now too, just wondering if you had any special reason for doing a slightly different thing here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
