https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108781
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > Issues: > ======= > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package is included in %doc. > Note: Cannot find LICENSE.txt in rpm(s) > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > --> FP. Actually, the license text IS in the packages, but the spec file uses the new %license macro, and fedora-review doesn't yet understand that macro. See bug 1127916. Take a look at the %files sections, and you'll see that both LICENSE.txt and COPYRIGHT.txt go into both packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
