Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719 Terje Røsten <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?([email protected] | |u.no) | --- Comment #16 from Terje Røsten <[email protected]> 2010-07-02 15:47:41 EDT --- Hi Alain, sorry about the delay. I started on a complete analyse of the license status. That job was a bit more complicated than expected (still more surprises in this package). Let's start with what I have so far. o sdk/tinyxml/ -> seems to be a private copy of a lib already in Fedora, not allowed. o src/codegen/codeparser.h src/codegen/codeparser.cpp -> no information about license, o controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/RESearch.h controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/StyleContext.h -> Public Domain o src/controls/include/wx/propgrid/* src/controls/include/wx/wxFlatNotebook/* src/controls/include/wx/wxScintilla/* -> wxWindows license? is that GPLv2+? o src/controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/* a strange mix of -> BSD, wxWin, Public Domain, GPLv2+? Would be nice you could comment on this findings and contact upstream about this fuzzy license status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
