https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133479



--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> ---
> we can't do it in one of the already available vdsm-* packages,
> because we want them also be signed as noarch 

The "BuildArch" tag can be set per subpackage. Package "vdsm", for example,
currently builds arch-specific packages as well as "noarch" packages. Creating
a separate empty src.rpm for that only creates overhead.


> What's wrong with using libname?

Why define %{libname} and not use it anywhere?

And if %libname were to be used in the spec file, why not simply use %name
instead?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to