https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154163
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> --- > This can only go in if API compatibility is guaranteed (or the soname is > bumped, but then it would lose soname compatibility with libjpeg 6.2, which > would suck) … or if they follow through with their plans of renaming the library altogether, in which case it would just be a separate library from libjpeg(-turbo) and neither Conflict with nor Obsolete libjpeg-turbo. (Only symbol conflicts could be an issue in that case.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
