https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152966
Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED
CC| |ville.sky...@iki.fi
Blocks| |496968 (DebugInfo)
--- Comment #9 from Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> ---
(In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #2)
> [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
Why is this "not applicable"? A brief look at the -debuginfo package reveals
that it contains no sources, and if rpmlint had been run against it, it would
also have reported it:
| $ rpmlint -i ./indi-gphoto-debuginfo-0.9.9-2.20141015svn1783.fc22.x86_64.rpm
| indi-gphoto-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
| This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files.
| This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during
| the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often
| is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have
security
| consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo
| extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not
| unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used.
Looking at the build log it is clear that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not being used,
and as rpmlint mentions, that's not only a debuginfo issue but also a potential
security one.
In this case the problem is in the upstream CMakeLists.txt, will attach a
patch, please submit it upstream.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496968
[Bug 496968] Tracking bug for packages with debuginfo problems
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
