https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147351
Julien Enselme <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme <[email protected]> --- > I have requested that upstream add a license file [1]. Thanks. > I don't see any reason to add a line to the spec file to remove the PKG-INFO. > It doesn't get installed on the system, so unless it changes the way the > package is built, I see no reason to do anything with it. As I said you can and you are not compelled to do so. > As for the python-imaging dependency as well as the first two lines of the > spec (and also the presence of a "Group:" tag), I do this because I intend to > submit this package to el6 and epel7 in addition to Fedora. This spec file > will work on all of the following release tags: f19 f20 f21 rawhide el6 > epel7. I would rather have extra logic in the spec file than have to maintain > multiple copies of it. It makes updating the package significantly easier. Point taken. Approuved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
