https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170802
Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> --- Review: + Package built successful in mock (f22 x86_64) + rpmlint on generated rpms gave output nodejs-relateurl.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Minify -> Magnify nodejs-relateurl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Minify -> Magnify nodejs-relateurl.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-relateurl.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Minify -> Magnify nodejs-relateurl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Minify -> Magnify 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball: dbcffd89b3830974076df9c9531c9705fdb5215ecf0d5c98f3afd6052bcbacaf upstream tarball: dbcffd89b3830974076df9c9531c9705fdb5215ecf0d5c98f3afd6052bcbacaf + License is "MIT" - License text file is not available. + follows nodejs packaging guidelines. Suggestions: 1) Group tag is optional 2) you can also write BuildRequires: npm(chai) 3)Many npm modules don't used to have LICENSE text file included. You should ask upstream to add license text file and release new upstream version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
