https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277
Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.es...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(dr...@land.ru)
--- Comment #16 from Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.es...@gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
---> build is performed ***WITHOUT*** any CFLAGS nor LDFLAGS!!!
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
---> debuginfo ist empty!!!
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[!]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
---> Compiler / Linker -flags are ***NOT*** applied properly.
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
---> timestamps of %doc and %license are modified during %prep.
===== Solution =====
Epic review-fail!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
