https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601
--- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> --- (In reply to Trevor Cordes from comment #12) > Hi, I just upgraded to F21 and (obviously) it broke my rt(3), so to my > dismay I come here and see there is no rtX in F21 (yet?). That may be a bit > disturbing and suprising for upgraders. Correct. rt3 is dead, gone and abandoned upstream, and should be removed anywhere (comprising EPEL and Fedora), because running it is a security risk. I had hoped this package was ready in time to replace rt3, unfortunately there doesn't seem to be sufficient interest in rt in Fedora to provide a review :( > Anyhow, what's the easiest way for me to rt back on my system. I realize it > will be rt4. Should I just grab your src/spec you provide here and build it > up myself? That's what I do - I am using them ;) > Will the fc22 srpms work on fc21? There also are fc21 versions on https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages I also have older versions of them on the packman repo (ftp://packman.links2linux.de/pub/packman/fedora). Likely I'll sync them with my Fedora submission. > What's going to be the ongoing plan for rt on F21? There is no plan - It's just that this review is stuck ;) > What's the best way for > me to ensure I stay patched? It certainly would be best to provide a review, such that these packages can be provided through Fedora :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
