https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261

Richard Shaw <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]



--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw <[email protected]> ---
Ok, pardon my ignorance but as you work at RedHat, do you actually require
sponsoring to be a Fedora packager or are you already sponsored?

Quick spec file review:
No major problems jump out at me so very good!

Minor nits:
1. It's preference, not required, but it's a good idea to list your
BuildRequires on separate lines. About the only time I list multiple is if they
are closely related (autoconf, automake) or let's say you have something that
manipulates images then I could see having all the image devel libraries on one
line.
2. Requires from the devel package should be arch specific, i.e.:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
to:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
3. In install since your not doing anything out of the ordinary you could use
the "%make_install" macro.
4. In %files unless your using non-default permissions you don't need %defattr.
5. Typically %doc is right under %files. It's not wrong to do so but it's
unusual.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to