https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299
Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #10 from Daniel Vrátil <[email protected]> --- > naming: I guess libksysguard is going to be a framework, they even called the > library KF5SysGuard so I would prefer to use kf5 prefix to avoid renaming it > in > future. That's not true. The "KF5" naming scheme is added by the patch that I added. That was back when it wasn't clear where libksysguard is going. Now it's clear it's going to remain in workspace. Unfortunately I caught this too late, but would anyone object against dropping kf5-ksysguard repo and instead importing this as libksysguard following the upstream naming, as Rex suggested? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
