https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127
--- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <[email protected]> --- > Assignee: [email protected] → [email protected] As pointed out in comment 16, the bugzilla review tickets are assigned to _the reviewer_, which in this case MUST be a reviewer who is also a packager sponsor. This is explained here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer Parts of the process may be a bit confusing, but we've all started somewhere. [...] About these rpmlint W/E: > safelease.src:38: W: macro-in-%changelog %libname > safelease.src:38: W: macro-in-%changelog %name You may want to escape them with a double '%%', so they are not expanded. Not only will it make the %changelog comment more readable, expanded macros in %changelog can cause problems. Not limited to garbage such as an expanded %configure macro. ;) > safelease.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/safelease/readme.md Not really an Error, but if one doesn't want to package empty files, one is better served with a guard somewhere in %prep or %install which would error out once the file has non-zero length -> a reminder to add it or revisit the packaging. Any replies to comment 16? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
