https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183218
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> --- Review ====== rpmlint output ============== perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jitter -> hitter, jotter, jitters perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jitter -> hitter, jotter, jitters checklist ========= - rpmlint OK - package and spec file naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is same as perl, OK for Fedora, spec matches - upstream LICENSE file packaged - spec file written in English and is legible - source matches upstream - package builds OK in mock for Rawhide x86_64 - buildreqs OK - no locales, libraries etc. to worry about - package is not intended to be relocatable - directory ownership and permissions OK - no duplicate files - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs, docs don't affect runtime - no sub-packages present or warranted - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - filenames are all ASCII notes ===== BR: perl(Config) only seems to be used in examples/threads.pl so is probably not needed Consider using %license LICENSE for EPEL-7 and all Fedora releases Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
