Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #38 from Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> 2010-07-13 17:41:27 EDT --- Looks pretty good. I see the following when running on libffado installed pkg (didn't know you could do that): libffado.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 /lib64/libexpat.so.1 libffado.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2 libffado.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 libffado.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 /usr/lib64/libsigc-2.0.so.0 libffado.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 libffado.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 /usr/lib64/libavc1394.so.0 I guess this, and Jay's comment, are the last remaining items? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
