https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333



--- Comment #26 from Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to James (purpleidea) from comment #22)
> (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #19)
> > After discussion with mitr, I am going to drop the polkit rule for now. The
> > policy is too big hammer ATM. We need something more tailored.
> > Unfortunately, I am not libvirt nor polkit expert. This should be probably
> > solved in similar manner to bug 957300.
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure entirely how this relates to the other bug

Including the file we are talking about, pretty much verbatim (except perhaps
using a different group name), in one of the main libvirt packages, would be a
resolution to bug 957300.  (This does not automatically mean that this is
precisely the right thing to do, but if this is to be done anywhere it should
be in the main libvirt srpm).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to